<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="../../Css/xml-sheet2.css" type="text/css" ?>
<html>
<head>
<meta name="robots" content="noindex" />meta1- elementti META -
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/xml; charset=ISO-8859-1" />
<style type="text/css">Uutta tyyli&#228; - elementti STYLE -</style>
<title>Problems in the new technology - elementti TITLE -</title>
</head>
<body>
<h2><a name="Uutta">Problems</a></h2>
<p><b>Structural solutions</b></p>
<p>All techniques have their own problems - <b>the basic advance in
my system is dynamic flexibility</b>, but the problem lies in the
appearance in large screens. The center area must have borders or
it must left free, when the vertical scroll bar might be
disturbing. To avoid this problem it is possible to make simpler
pages, but they have less or not all structural dynamics.</p>
<p><b>New technologies and incompatibility to old systems.</b></p>
<p><b>CSS</b></p>
<ul>
<li>The illustrative navigation works today only with Microsoft IE
4.01/5.0 browsers, but in future - I hope soon - also Netscape 5.0
and Opera 4.0 support them.</li>
<li>Only Opera can give today satisfactory printing</li>
<li>CSS works today better with frames as with tables.</li>
<li>The scalability of basic text need relative font defintions at
least to Microsoft browsers, which partially limits the
possiblities of CSS. Opera is at this matter without problems,
because it can zoom everything 20-1000% using 21 different
values.</li>
<li>The dynamic exchange of the appearance require relative poor
appearance in old browsers - in fact in some matters older browsers
must degrade when catering maximum flexibility to CSS supporting
browsers! But concerning temporary font colors and font face, font
definitions can define so, that they are defined both to old and
new browsers and they don't decrease drastic the flexibility of
CSS. <b>The advance of CSS technology is that the text itself is
readable with very old browsers.</b></li>
</ul>
<p><b>Javascript</b></p>
<p>Exchanging images with movements of mouse are pleasant . It is
possible to combine javascripts to CSS, but it can fulfil so, that
also older browser can read the contents. I most cases problems
with older browsers can be eliminated.</p>
<p><b>XML</b>, <b>XHTML</b> and <b>WML</b></p>
<table class="tables"><tr class="tables-tr"><td class="tables-td"><p>XML, which I have a little bit studied, is some level problem,
because pure XML is incompatible to old browsers.</p>
<p>It is however possible to make XML, which is quite compatible to old browsers, which also IE 5.0 can display almost correctly.</p>
<p>To make basic XML documents might be even easier as ordinary
HTML documents, because the author can use own tags and he doesn't
need to learn mass of tags. But because the appearance of own tags
is not defined, it is necessary also to understand CSS (or <b>XSL</b> (<b>XSL</b> = <i>
e<b>X</b>tensible <b>S</b>tylesheet <b>L</b>anguage</i> - quite the same kind of language as CSS ). When author use his own
tags, the text is readable, but special contents and formatting
doesn't have any affect.</p>
<p>There is also the possibility to make mixed XHTML documents,
which major information is compatible to old browsers.</p>
</td></tr></table>
</body>
</html>

